SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > School > Story

Published - Wednesday, August 27, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (2 comment(s))

Schools put test results to work

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
All the tests Onalaska students took during the school year, all the ones generating sweaty palms and queasy stomachs, will help those kids learn better next year. Smart kids who jump ahead will be kept interested while those who did not do well will get more attention and perhaps even a different style of teaching that might better reach them.

Early in June, school administrators and teachers jammed test numbers together into what was called “mind-blowing number crunching” during Onalaska’s annual data retreat.

Principals wielding poster displays and hand-outs, looking much like their own students, Monday reported results of the data retreat to the Onalaska Board of Eduation.

They said test scores demonstrate strengths and weaknesses in the schools. “Teachers need to know what is working and what is not working,” Superintendent John Burnett said. “Then we have to have a shared vision of what it will take for our students to be successful.”

Middle school Principal Roger Fruit said numbers from the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Exam — the mandated “No Child Left Behind” test — are cause for celebration. But he quickly added that a close look at the more accurate MAP test shows sub-groups in the student population that are not doing well.

For instance, findings show special education students are not doing as well as expected. “It is not the kids’ fault but how we are trying to bring them along,” Fruit said.

Middle school reading and math scores are such that the school will have an entirely revamped daily schedule this coming year. “This gives targeted kids the extra time they need so they have the time they need for these subjects,” Fruit said.

Test statistics for high school students call for a variety of methods including structured study halls. There will be a focus on each student passing each class before moving along. “There will be no failures,” Principal Pete Woerpel promised.

Most principals reported seeing “success problems” with children of lower socio-economic status and those in minority groups. Those groups are also growing slowly statistically in a district reputed to be upper middle income and professional.

School board members lauded the reports and the effort at using data to better focus education in the district. “This is one of the most exciting meetings of the year,” board member Mark Cassellius said.

“This is a dramatic change from seven or eight years ago,” board President Kirby Lentz noted.

People

The board approved the following hirings:

  • Jennifer Rasmussen, Title I reading teacher position at Northern Hills Elementary.

  • Suzanne Rieke, limited-term music teacher at Irving Pertzsch Elementary

  • Stephanie Broder, limited-term first grade teacher at Northern Hills Elementary.

    In co-curricular positions, Jan Brock was hired as assistant varsity tennis coach, and Steve Torres resigned as assistant freshman football coach.

    Kathleen Bray, Eagle Bluff Elementary paraprofessional, resigned.

    Administration is recommending the creation of a full-time first-grade teacher position at Pertzsch Elementary effective Aug. 25.

    Administration also is requesting the deletion of one .533 FTE paraprofessional at Eagle Bluff Elementary effective Aug. 12.
    .
  •    Advertisement   
     Tell us what you think...

     Comments »

    Team member wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:15 AM:

    " Beyond . . . is absolutely correct in saying building relationships is the first step to helping students achieve. We do believe that we first need to get to know the child before we get to know the student. We also know we can do a better job in building those relationships.

    Regarding assessment data analysis, the school staff monitor group data three times per year and again in June (the retreat reported about in this article). Individual data is collected more often on students who are in danger of falling through the cracks, to determine whether instructional interventions we are trying are working. Data is collected from a number of assessment types. They help us find out what the students dont know. Then, prior to determining an intervention, we try to understand whether the lack of achievement is because students cant do, wont do or just didnt have enough time to learn. Although we look to the students and families to be part of the solution, we look in the mirror for solutions to improved instruction that can lead to increased student achievement. "

    Beyond the numbers wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:28 AM:

    " I hope Onalaska will look beyond numbers. Many schools make the mistake of looking from a pure standardized test perspective when a full assessment (including qualitative and quantitative data) gives a much clearer picture of each child's strengths and weaknesses. This also goes beyond individual teachers qualitative observations (which are often skewed for the positive or negative depending on the situation).

    Structured study halls and focused tutoring may be the answer BUT engagement, caring, and relationship building may also be a vital part of the answer. The state standardized test will not tell you how a child learns best nor with an assessment like the "VARK" (this tells how a student may PREFER to learn). Lets talk to these kids, the families (when available) and make quality time to get to know each child. Individualize public schools instruction and these kids have a much better shot. Yes, this may mean hiring more teachers, but with new standards we have to try new things.

    Best of luck to the district... I hope the data analysis moves from (what sounds like) a once a year meeting behind a closed door to continuous supportive assessment... because until then... it will stay numbers and decisions will be made for problems that may or may not exist. "


    The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Onalaska Life.

     Post a comment »

    (optional)
       
    Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
    About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
    Copyright © 2006 The Onalaska Life. All rights reserved.
    Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.